IF HILLARY CLINTON SEIZES THE WHITE HOUSE, IT WILL BE AN ILLEGITIMATE, NULL AND VOID THEFT OF POWER... DEMOCRACY OBLITERATED... AMERICA A FAILED STATE

If Hillary Clinton seizes the White House, it will be an illegitimate, null and void THEFT of power... democracy OBLITERATED... America a FAILED state

Friday, October 21, 2016
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Tags: Hillary Clinton, election fraud, White House





(NaturalNews) In a little over two weeks, we're going to find out whether we have a country anymore. If Hillary Clinton seizes the White House, she will preside over an illegitimate, illegal dictatorship that was seized through massive fraud, collusion and corruption at every level.

Without all the fraud, collusion and corruption, Hillary Clinton would have been indicted for criminal violations of national security. She would be down 20 points in the polls, and the media wouldn't be covering up all her crimes and failures. Without the collusion, Hillary Clinton wouldn't have known all the TV debate questions ahead of time. The voter "panels" wouldn't have been coached by Clinton operatives to regurgitate rehearsed comments, and the official media polls wouldn't have been rigged to construct the appearance of widespread Clinton support.

Every element of this election is so rigged, so illegal and so fraudulent that if Hillary Clinton "wins" this vote, the Presidency of the United States will be null and void.

As Wikileaks accurately states in this tweet, "There is no US election. There is power consolidation. Rigged primary, rigged media and rigged 'pied piper' candidate drive consolidation."




"Sadly, it is difficult to disagree with the assessment," adds Zero Hedge. "That an establishment democratic candidate could endure an extended FBI investigation, in which multiple federal laws were clearly and intentionally broken, and clear evidence of corruption and collusion between the FBI and State Department is mind boggling. Throw in evidence from WikiLeaks clearly linking the DNC to criminal efforts to incite violence at rallies, numerous examples of pay-to-play activities at the Clinton Foundation, blatant media collusion, etc, etc, and it actually becomes quite frightening."


Donald Trump should REJECT the results of a fraudulent, stolen election
All this explains why Donald Trump should openly and firmly reject the results of a fraudulent election. It is not anti-democratic to do so, by the way, when your opponent despises democracy and has rigged the entire election from the start to obliterate democratic principles.

What's clear right now is that democrats hate democracy. They despise a free and fair election because they don't trust the voters to elect democrats unless massive fraud is involved. This demonstrates, by the way, just how much the democrats know their own leaders are hated by the voters. (It's also why democrats can never run for office by telling the truth of what they plan to do. Case in point: Hillary's ridiculous claim that she "will not add a penny" to the national debt.)

To seize the White House and put Hillary Clinton in power, democrats have abandoned every principle of fair elections, invoking a "win at all costs" strategy that thrusts their party leaders and operatives into the category of lawless tyrants and Third World dictators running a criminal regime. To democrats, laws don't matter. Fairness doesn't matter. Even democracy doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is seizing power by any means, even if it involves hiring people to violently assault Trump supporters at rallies (see ProjectVeritasAction.com for the video footage) or colluding with the head of the FBI to avoid the criminal prosecution of their nominee.

As Selwyn Duke writes in The New American, "No, Trump Should Not Accept the Results of a Possibly Stolen Election."

Reality No. 1: There is vote fraud.

Reality No. 2: Since there's vote fraud, it's possible an election -- especially a close one -- could be stolen.

Yet the three-little-monkey coward-cons think that, somehow, it's noble and healthy to view a possibly stolen election and say "Nothing to see here; move along." Maybe if we pretend hard enough, everything will be okay.


Until Hillary Clinton, James Comey, Loretta Lynch, Bill Clinton and other corrupt democrat operatives are behind bars, America does not have a legitimate federal government
One of the very best reasons to vote for Donald Trump -- and perhaps the most important reason of all -- is because he promises to seek criminal investigations of the most lawless operatives in the Obama / Clinton regime.

Until America "drains the swamp" and wrests the criminal slag out of the halls of power in Washington D.C., we cannot move forward as a nation that claims to respect law. The outrageous lawlessness of the Clintons and the entire democrat establishment must be brought to an end by We the People. If it cannot be brought to an end at the ballot box, I have no doubt that concerned citizens will find other ways to take back their country from the criminals in Washington.

Right now, voting for Donald Trump is the last (and best) hope to prevent America from being seized by a criminal cabal of deep corruption and runaway lawlessness that has infected every institution in our nation, across every branch of government. Should this effort be thwarted by the criminal conspiracy of the Clintons, the media, the FBI, the DOJ and all the other co-conspirators involved in all this, America ceases to become a nation of law and plunges into Third World dictatorship status (with all the obvious ramifications that follow such political corruption).


Beware of the intense, destructive evil that will fester out of a powerful, centralized political establishment which realizes it is ABOVE THE LAW
As Hillary Clinton seizes the White House, the message to all the elite leftist power brokers will be obvious: We can get away with anything! They will realize they can commit any crime they want... and the media will cover up their crimes while the FBI excuses their actions with contorted legal immunities and whitewashed explanations. They will be above the law, and they will know that they control every institution in government, effectively granting themselves absolute power and absolute immunity.

When, in the history of the world, has the concentration of absolute power into the hands of the few ever turned out well for the populace?

It is a vast understatement to remind you that this is the most dangerous time in the entire history of our nation since the American Revolution. Once the democrats realize they have absolute power with zero accountability, there will be death squads to seek out and murder their political opponents. Websites critical of the Clinton regime will be seized and silenced. People who speak out against the regime will find themselves indicted by the IRS, or investigated by the FTC, or arrested by the DEA after drugs are planted in their homes. What the Obama regime has already done to Julian Assange, the Clinton regime will do to Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, Alex Jones and Sean Hannity.

The prisons will be filled with the political enemies of the regime in power... and then to clear out the prisons, the mass murders will begin. Piece by piece, the corrupt democrats will become the Fourth Reich, murdering their political enemies, demanding absolute obedience (P.C. thought control), raising their rhetoric to levels of psychological insanity that haven't been witnessed since the days of Adolf Hitler.

And sometime during all this, the armed American people will realize they have nothing more to lose, and they will almost certainly pick up their rifles, march on Washington and lay it all on the line to either take back their country or die trying. Because in a society where the Second Amendment still lives, it only takes about 1% of the population to take their country back from a corrupt, criminal regime.

The only good news in all this is that democrats hate firearms, which means they won't be able to put up much of a fight if all this plunges into kinetic action. In other words, if America devolves into a shooting war -- open revolution or armed revolt -- there's no question that the gun owners win.

Why do you think Obama and the Clintons have been desperately trying to take away guns from all the citizens? And why do you think that all the talk about gun control never suggests the government itself should be disarmed? No, "gun control" isn't about reducing gun violence... it's about monopolizing the power of gun violence into the hands of the corrupt government regime so that the citizens are defenseless (and so much easier to round up, imprison, or execute).

Read your history, folks. If you don't learn from it, you're doomed to repeat it. Every time corrupt regimes concentrate power into the hands of the (criminal) few, it ends in genocide or bloodshed. Hillary Clinton is thrusting America into a future of intense pain, suffering and death. Remember all this as you cast your vote on November 8th.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/055729_Hillary_Clinton_election_fraud_White_House.html#ixzz4NqY0XifZ