IRANIAN OFFICIAL: U.S. 'BEGGING US FOR A DEAL'

February 6, 2015

Iranian official: US 'begging us for a deal'

By Rick Moran

An Iranian military leader told state run media that US negotiators were "begging us" to sign a nuclear deal

Washington Free Beacon:

   Mohammad Reza Naghdi, the commander of the Basij, a paramilitary group operating under the wing of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corp (IRGC), recently claimed that the “Americans are begging us for a deal on the negotiation table,” according to comments published in Persian and independently translated for the Washington Free Beacon.

   Naghdi added that American officials routinely “plea” with Iran in talks and that the United States is negotiating from a position of weakness, according to his comments, which follow earlier reports claiming that Iran’s leading negotiator “frequently shouts” at U.S. officials.

   The military leader’s remarks appear to jibe with new reports that the United States is conceding ground to Iran in talks and will now allow it to “keep much of its uranium-enriching technology,” according to the Associated Press.

   Iran, the AP reported, “refuses to meet U.S.-led demands for deep cuts in the number of centrifuges it uses to enrich uranium, a process that can create material for anything from chemotherapy to the core of an atomic bomb.”

   Regional experts say that the Iranians feel that they are in a position of power in the talks and believe that the Obama administration is desperate to ink a deal.

   “Iran feels the administration needs the deal, and this belief is supported by the way the administration is acting,” said Saeed Ghasseminejad, an Iranian dissident and associate fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

   America’s “hostility toward its traditional allies in the region, Israel and Saudi Arabia, is at its historical peak and the Obama administration either supports Iran to expand its influence in the region or at least does not oppose it at all,” Ghasseminejad explained. “Iran feels as long as the negotiation is going on, it has a green light to do whatever it wants in the region, so why should they bother to sign a deal?”

It is absolutely astonishing how many concessions we've already made to the Iranians in order to keep them talking. And now, according to AP, we've completely dropped the pretense that we want to prevent Iran from getting the bomb, and have adopted a policy of making it appear we're stopping them:

   Experts warn that any reduction in centrifuge efficiency is reversible more quickly than a straight decrease in the number of machines, an argument that could be seized upon by powerful critics of the talks in the U.S. Congress.

   The diplomats are familiar with the talks but spoke only on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to discuss them. Ahead of a new round of negotiations this week, they said there is no guarantee that the proposal can be finessed into an agreement.

   According to the diplomats, the proposal could leave most of Iran's nearly 10,000 centrifuges in place but reconfigure them to reduce the amount of enriched uranium they produce.

   One of the diplomats said the deal could include other limitations to ensure that Tehran's program is kept in check.

   For one, Iran would be allowed to store only a specific amount of uranium gas, which is fed into centrifuges for enrichment. The amount of gas would depend on the number of centrifuges it keeps.

   Second, Iran would commit to shipping out most of the enriched uranium it produces, leaving it without enough to make a bomb. Iran denies any interest in nuclear weapons and says its program is for peaceful uses such as nuclear power and medical technology.

Iran has already declared they will not ship any of their enriched uranium to Russia. In fact, any effort to limit their ability to enrich uranium at all has been met with stone cold opposition by the Iranians. So western negotiators have had to finesse the issues by proposing meaningless strictures against the Iranian nuclear program, that won't prevent them from getting the bomb, but will lead to an "historic" agreement that will normalize relations with Tehran.

The Senate will not approve any deal with Iran. But that won't stop Obama from declaring that he's brought us peace in our time while enabling Iran's hegemony in the region.


Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/02/iranian_official_us_begging_us_for_a_deal.html#ixzz3RMZ8VIHM